Sold
to Satan

A proposed Form 38.08 demand asking a named Defendant to say whether the filed Defence alleges or relies on specified material facts. If such an allegation is made, the draft asks for the conduct attributed to the Plaintiff, the approximate date or period, the location, the alleged role, and the Defence paragraph. It states that the demand seeks pleading particulars rather than evidence or private litigation strategy.

Locations mentioned: Halifax, Nova Scotia; Nova Scotia court record

A proposed notice of motion, supporting affidavit, brief, and draft order under the Nova Scotia Rules. It asks for a focused further and better statement of a Defence, limited to material facts, and requests a hearing at the Halifax Law Courts on November 12, 2026 if the Court permits it to be added to that hearing. The packet marks bracketed fields, exhibits, and the current filed Defence for verification.

Locations mentioned: Halifax Law Courts; Halifax, Nova Scotia

A proposed motion seeking directions for separate sworn answers from Jon Cameron and Alan Warkentin about disputed party names in the operative Nova Scotia documents. It uses a separate British Columbia response as a limited reference point and asks for the exact name, the type of alleged error, a corrected legal name if known, and an address for service if known. The draft reserves questions of amendment, joinder, liability, and jurisdiction.

Locations mentioned: Halifax Law Courts; Nova Scotia; British Columbia proceeding referenced

A Form 19.05 demand directed to Jon Cameron. The questions concern whether a person in the current Nova Scotia originating documents is incorrectly named, what exact name appears, what type of error is alleged, any corrected legal name or service address known, and which page or paragraph of a referenced British Columbia response addresses the issue. The document is expressly labelled not for court filing.

Locations mentioned: Nova Scotia court record; British Columbia response referenced

A response-brief template for a motion to dismiss an action for want of jurisdiction. It separates territorial competence from forum non conveniens, discusses alleged Nova Scotia connections, identifies chronology and evidence points that need verification, and asks that any local claims continue in Nova Scotia if the legal test is met. The caption, dates, parties, exhibits, and filing information remain placeholders.

Locations mentioned: Halifax, Nova Scotia; British Columbia proceeding referenced

An affidavit template for the jurisdiction motion. It distinguishes personal observations from information received from others and identifies proposed evidence locations including 26 Meadowbrook Drive, a parking area, Brunswick Street, and Halifax. It also refers to a separate British Columbia proceeding and asks for dates, sources, witnesses, records, and financial or travel details to be completed before the affidavit is sworn or affirmed.

Locations mentioned: 26 Meadowbrook Drive, Halifax; Brunswick Street; Vancouver and Haro Street referenced

A proposed disposition for a want-of-jurisdiction motion. The draft would dismiss the motion, refuse a dismissal order, decline a stay in favour of British Columbia, and continue the action in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, subject to the Court's directions. Court, file, party, Justice, and costs details remain to be completed.

Locations mentioned: Nova Scotia court record; British Columbia stay referenced

A three-page responding brief for the motion of Jon Cameron and Alan Warkentin to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. It records a November 12, 2026 hearing at The Law Courts in Halifax, separates territorial competence from forum non conveniens, and asks that the action continue in Nova Scotia or that the motion be adjourned for a properly noticed amendment request. It refers to the separate British Columbia proceeding as part of the comparison the Court may need to make.

Locations mentioned: Halifax Law Courts; Nova Scotia; British Columbia proceeding referenced

A Form 39.08 affidavit of Robert Colin Urquhart responding to a motion by Jon Cameron and Alan Warkentin. It records a Halifax address history, identifies the Hfx. No. 553352 claim, distinguishes a British Columbia period from later Nova Scotia conduct, and describes proposed evidence at or near 26 Meadowbrook Drive and Brunswick Street. It is a draft affidavit and includes statements that should be checked against records before use.

Locations mentioned: 26 Meadowbrook Drive, Halifax; 401-2075 Brunswick Street; Haro Street in Vancouver referenced

The PDF counterpart to the Form 39.08 response affidavit. It retains the same case caption and core account as the DOCX version while presenting the affidavit as a three-page PDF. The archive keeps both formats together so the text and rendered version can be compared.

Locations mentioned: 26 Meadowbrook Drive, Halifax; 401-2075 Brunswick Street; Haro Street in Vancouver referenced

A one-page Form 78.05 proposed order for the November 12, 2026 jurisdiction motion at The Law Courts in Halifax. It sets out alternative outcomes: dismissing the motion if territorial competence is found, or adjourning it to permit a properly noticed amendment request if the current pleading does not include the distinct Nova Scotia events. It also requests complete Nova Scotia and British Columbia pleadings and orders, with costs reserved.

Locations mentioned: Halifax Law Courts; Nova Scotia; British Columbia proceeding referenced

An earlier DOCX version of a supplementary Form 39.08 affidavit about court papers received by Canada Post. It lists missing pages, an order, a registrar communication, a cover page, and other materials that the affiant says affected review of the record. The file contains allegations and wording that should be treated as the affiant's draft account, not as findings of the Court.

Locations mentioned: Halifax, Nova Scotia; British Columbia claim referenced

A shorter PDF revision of the supplementary affidavit. It records the receipt of an incomplete package, identifies missing pages, an order, a registrar communication, a cover page, and other materials, and refers to the British Columbia claim and the “Westosha case.” The PDF is kept beside the DOCX because the two versions differ in wording and scope.

Locations mentioned: Halifax, Nova Scotia; British Columbia claim and the referenced “Westosha case”

The supplied blank Nova Scotia Form 39.08 affidavit template. It provides the standard heading, witness and source-of-information instructions, numbered-paragraph guidance, and commissioning block used by several affidavit drafts in the archive.

Locations mentioned: Nova Scotia

The current-named copy of the supplied blank Form 39.08 template. The available comparison found it byte-for-byte identical to the earlier copy, so both files remain listed to preserve the source set and its version check.

Locations mentioned: Nova Scotia

A 396-page Nova Scotia Part 22 forms reference volume. Its opening index lists court forms such as Notices of Action, Statements of Claim, Notices of Defence, applications, objections, appeals, and other procedural forms. It is included as background reference material rather than as a case-specific filing.

Locations mentioned: Nova Scotia